<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JAMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4352</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jamp.2016.412215</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JAMP-72985</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Soliton Solutions and Numerical Treatment of the Nonlinear Schrodinger’s Equation Using Modified Adomian Decomposition Method
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Abeer</surname><given-names>Al-Shareef</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Alyaa</surname><given-names>A. Al Qarni</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Safa</surname><given-names>Al-Mohalbadi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Huda</surname><given-names>O. Bakodah</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Al Faisaliah Campus, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Blqarn Campus, Bisha University, Bisha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>05</day><month>12</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>2215</fpage><lpage>2232</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>November</day>	<month>15,</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>23,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>December</day>	<month>26,</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  In this paper, the improved Adomian decomposition method (ADM) is applied to the nonlinear Schr&amp;oumldinger’s equation (NLSE), one of the most important partial differential equations in quantum mechanics that governs the propagation of solitons through optical fibers. The performance and the accuracy of our improved method are supported by investigating several numerical examples that include initial conditions. The obtained results are compared with the exact solutions. It is shown that the method does not need linearization, weak or perturbation theory to obtain the solutions.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Nonlinear Differential Equation</kwd><kwd> Schr&#246;dinger Equation</kwd><kwd> Adomian Decomposition</kwd><kwd> Reliable Technique</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The study of optical solitons has been going on for the past few decades [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72985-ref1">1</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72985-ref10">10</xref>] . The governing equation for the propagation of optical solitons for trans-continental and trans-oceanic distances through an optical fiber is given by the nonlinear Schr&#246;dinger’s equation (NLSE) that can be derived from the Maxwell’s equation with the aid of multiple scale analysis. For birefringent fibers and dense wavelength division multiplexed (DWDM) systems, this NLSE is generalized to the corresponding vector version. The scalar NLSE, with constant coefficients, which is typically used to study solitons in a polarization preserving fiber is integrable by the classical method of inverse scattering transform (IST) and for Kerr law nonlinearity only. The NLS equation plays an important role in the modeling of several physical phenomena such as the propagation of optical pulses, waves in fluids and plasma, self-focusing effects in lasers, and trapping of atomic gas in Bose-Einstein condensates. Several numerical methods have been proposed to solve the nonlinear Schr&#246;dinger’s equation (NLSE) approximately. Many of them are explicit difference scheme [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72985-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72985-ref12">12</xref>] and Adomian decomposition method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72985-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72985-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72985-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72985-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72985-ref17">17</xref>] . The Adomian decomposition method provides the solution in a rapid convergent series with computable terms. This method was successfully applied to nonlinear differential equations. Different modifications to solve nonlinear differential equations are given in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72985-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72985-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72985-ref20">20</xref>] . The modifications arise from evaluating difficulties specific for the type of problem under consideration. The modification usually involves only a slight change and is aimed at improving the convergence or accuracy of the solution. The main goal of this paper is to apply some modifications of Adomian decomposition method to the nonlinear Schr&#246;dinger’s equation and compare the results with the exact solutions.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Analytical Solution for Nonlinear Schrodinger Equation (NLSE)</title><p>The dimensionless form of the generalized NLSE that is going to be studied in this paper is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula88"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x2.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Here, the dependent variable u is a complex valued function, while x and t are the two independent variables. The coefficients <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are constants and m is a constant parameter, where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, transforms the NLSE to its generalized form. The generalized NLSE is partial differential equation that is not integrable, in general. The non- integrability is not necessarily related to the nonlinear term in it. Also, in generalized NLSE, F is a real-valued algebraic function and it is necessary to have the smoothness of the complex function<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, considering the complex plane C as a two- dimensional linear space R<sup>2</sup>. The Kerr law of nonlinearity originates from the fact that a light wave in an optical fiber faces nonlinear responses from non-harmonic motion of electrons bound in molecules, caused by an external electric field. Even though the nonlinear responses are extremely weak, their effects appear in various ways over long distance of propagation that is measured in terms of light wavelength. The origin of nonlinear response is related to the non-harmonic motion of bound electrons under the influence of an applied field. As a result the induced polarization is not linear in the electric field, but involves higher order terms in electric field amplitude. In the case of Kerr law nonlinearity where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, thus the NLSE is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula89"><label>(2.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x8.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The aim of this section is to obtain an exact bright, dark, and singular 1-soliton solution to this equation. The Ansatz method is used. In order to set up the starting point, the solitons are written in the phase-amplitude format as<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Where P is the amplitude component of the soliton and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is its phase component, defined as <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> k is the frequency of the solution’s while w represents the wave number and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the phase constant. Substituting (2.2) and (2.3) into (2.1)</p><p>and decomposing into real and imaginary parts lead to <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. From the imaginary part equation it is possible to obtain the</p><p>speed v of the soliton as<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The real part equation will be integrated from three types of solitons, namely, the bright, dark and singular soliton solution.</p><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Bright Soliton</title><p>For bright solitons, the starting hypothesis is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula90"><label>(2.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x16.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula91"><label>(2.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x17.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where, A represents the amplitude of the soliton and B is the inverse width of the soliton and v is the speed of the soliton.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula92"><label>(2.4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x18.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Balancing principle yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula93"><label>(2.5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x19.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting (2.5) into (2.4) we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula94"><label>(2.6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x20.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Setting the coefficients of the linearly independent functions <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to zero leads to <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> From coefficient <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we get <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and therefore</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>This leads to the bright soliton solution</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula95"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x26.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which will exist for the necessary constraints in place.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Dark Solitons</title><p>For dark solitons, the starting hypothesis is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula96"><label>(2.7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x27.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>For dark solitons the parameters A and B are free parameters. Substituting and applying Balancing principle yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula97"><label>(2.8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x28.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From coefficient of the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> into (2.8), we get <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and therefore <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> From coefficient of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we get <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and therefore</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>This gives dark soliton solution <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>along with their respective constraints as indicated.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Singular Solitons</title><p>For singular solitons, the starting hypothesis is given by<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Upon substituting and applying balancing principle yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula98"><label>(2.9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x37.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From coefficient of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> into (2.9), we get <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and therefore <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> From coefficient of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we get <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and therefore</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>These lead to singular soliton solutions</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula99"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x44.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which will exist for the necessary constraints in place.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Nonlinear Schrodinger Equation by Standard Adomian Method (SADM)</title><p>The NLS equation describes the spatio-temporal evolution of the complex field <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and has the general form (2.1) with the initial condition</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula100"><label>(3.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x46.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The solution of a nonlinear Schr&#246;dinger equation will be reduced by using standard Adomian decomposition method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72985-ref21">21</xref>] . Equation (2.1) is rewritten in an operator form as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula101"><label>(3.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x47.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> Then, the solution function, which obtains by Ado-</p><p>mian decomposition method is assumed to be given by a series form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula102"><label>(3.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x49.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where the components <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are going to be determined recurrently, while the nonlinear term is <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in (2.1) is decomposed into an infinite series of polynomials of the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula103"><label>(3.4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x52.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> called Adomian polynomials of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> defined by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula104"><label>(3.5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x55.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Operating on both sides of Equation (3.2) with the integral operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> after using the initial displacements given by (3.1) and substituting Equations (3.3) and (3.4) into the resulting functional equation it gives</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula105"><label>(3.6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x57.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then following the Adomian decomposition method introduced by Wazwaz [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72985-ref13">13</xref>] in order to solve Equation (3.6) the following recurrence relation is proposed</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula106"><label>(3.7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x58.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Setting <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> u the Adomian polynomials<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>that represent the nonlinear term<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. The Modifications of the Adomian Decomposition Method</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Reliable Technique</title><p>In this section, a reliable modification of the Adomian decomposition method decomposition method developed by Wazwaz [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72985-ref13">13</xref>] will be reduced. The modified form was established based on the assumption that the function f can be divided into two parts namely <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Under this assumption we set <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> .</p><p>Based on this, the modified recursive relation is formulated as follows</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula107"><label>(4.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x67.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The choice of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> contains the minimal number of terms has a strong influence accelerates the convergence of the solution. The modification demonstrate a rapid convergence of the series solution if compared with standard (ADM) and it may give the exact solution for nonlinear equations by using two iterations only without using the so-called Adomian polynomials.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. The New Modification</title><p>In the new modification [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72985-ref22">22</xref>] , Wazwaz replaced the process of dividing f into two component by a series of infinite components, so f be expressed in Taylor series <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> . Moreover, he suggests a new recursive relationship expressed in the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula108"><label>(4.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x78.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>in this research, it is shown that if f consists of one term only, then scheme (4.1) reduces to relation (3.7). Moreover, if f consists of two terms, then relation (4.2) reduces to the modified relation (4.1).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Numerical Illustrations</title><sec id="s5_1"><title>5.1. Example 1</title><p>Consider the nonlinear cubic Schrodinger equation (NLS) which has the general form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula109"><label>(5.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x79.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x80.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a real parameter and. In Equation (2.12) the function u governs the evolution of a weakly nonlinear, strongly dispersive, almost monochromatic wave. Assuming initial condition of the form,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula110"><label>(5.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x81.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and boundary conditions</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula111"><label>(5.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x82.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>the initial boundary value problem (IBVP) (5.1)-(5.3) gives rise to soliton solutions in which the solution and its derivatives with respect to x vanish as <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x83.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72985-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72985-ref24">24</xref>] . For the single-soliton case, when <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x83.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x84.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> the function</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula112"><label>(5.4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x85.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfies Equations (2.12)-(2.14). For fixed t the function u in Equation (5.4) decays exponentially as <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x87.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and it represents a soliton-type disturbance which travels with speed c; its amplitude is governed by the real parameter a.</p><p>1) Standard Adomian Decomposition Method</p><p>Consider the initial condition</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula113"><label>(5.6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x88.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using standard ADM the solution of the NLS equation is given by the following approximation;</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula114"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x89.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The approximating Adomian decomposition method was tested to NLS equation for the single-soliton wave to the problems with boundary lines <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x90.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x90.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x91.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> it is presented the modulus <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x90.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x91.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x92.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of the theoretical solution of NLS with q = 1, a = 0.01 and velocity c = 0.1 for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x90.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x91.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x92.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x93.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, while in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> the corresponding approximate solution (SADM)|. Finally in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> is listed the absolute error.</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> The graph of the exact solution for example 1</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x94.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> The graph of the approximate solution (SADM) for example 1</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x95.png"/></fig><p>2) Reliable Technique</p><p>Now we assume that the function f can be divided into two parts namely <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x98.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x98.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x100.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> . Under this assumption we set</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula115"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x101.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> various time step combinations are examined and compared with results given by exact solution.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> The absolute error when x = 10</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Standard ADM</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000703381</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000140626</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000210864</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000281052</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00035119</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000421277</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000491314</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0005613</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000631235</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00070112</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> The absolute error when x = 10 </title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Reliable ADM</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000704382</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000140881</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000211328</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000281779</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000352234</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000422694</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000491314</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000563623</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000634093</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000704566</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>3) The New Modification</p><p>In the new modification, the process of dividing f into two components is replaced by a series of infinite components. The recursive relationship expressed in the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula116"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x104.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Remark. When using the new modification for ADM the computations of the integrals will be simpler but we need a large number of components to get accurate results, which may lead to accumulation of round of error.</p></sec><sec id="s5_2"><title>5.2. Example 2</title><p>Consider the nonlinear Schrodinger equation (NLS)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula117"><label>(5.7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x105.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Subject to the initial condition of the form,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula118"><label>(5.8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x106.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>1) The Standard ADM</p><p>So, we get the recurrent relation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula119"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x107.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula120"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x108.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We can calculate few terms as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula121"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x109.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><img data-original="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x110.png" /> <img data-original="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x112.png" /></p><p>The solution is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula122"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x113.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The behavior of the ADM solution obtained for different values of time is compared with the exact solution in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>. It is to be noted that the exact solution of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x114.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> was given as<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x114.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x115.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>In <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>, the absolute errors in different time value are listed.</p><p>Remark: As it seen from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, the numerical results of ADM are in very good agreement with their analytical values obtained from the exact solution. Moreover, from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> it can be seen that the error are somewhat small as the number of the components (n) in Adomian series is increasing.</p><p>2) Reliable Technique</p><fig-group id="fig3"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> The graph of the exact solution and ADM solution at t = 0.1, t = 0.03 and t = 0.5.</title></caption><fig id ="fig3_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x116.png"/></fig></fig-group><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> The absolute error when t = 0.03, t = 0.1 and t = 0.5</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >x</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Absolute Error at t = 0.03</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Absolute Error at t = 0.1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Absolute Error at t = 0.5</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.370059347 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000041661332570</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0025955039</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.370059347 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000041660562770</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0025955040</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.381153649 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000041661206330</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0025955039</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.374685170 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000041660544070</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0025955038</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.377217790 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000041660937870</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0025955040</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.379127106 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000041661050360</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0025955038</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.370356064 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000041660713930</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0025955040</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.375440712 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000041660511770</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0025955038</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.373499667 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000041662206490</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0025955036</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.376684765 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000041661306230</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0025955037</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.370830758 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000041660782630</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0025955036</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig-group id="fig4"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> The graph of the exact solution and ADM solution at n = 1, n = 2 and n = 3.</title></caption><fig id ="fig4_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x117.png"/></fig></fig-group><p>We set</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula123"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x118.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>, various time step combinations are examined and compared with exact solution.</p><p>The behavior of the Reliable ADM solution is compared with the exact solution in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>.</p><p>3) The New Modification</p><p>To apply the new modification we replace f by a series of infinite components. Then, we can calculate few terms as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula124"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x119.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula125"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x120.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula126"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x121.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula127"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x122.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula128"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x123.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The solution is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula129"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x124.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>, the absolute error in different time value is listed.</p><p>In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>, the behavior of the new modification solution obtained for different values of time:</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title>The absolute error when x = 10</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Reliable ADM</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.257913922</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0448678059</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0584708828</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0687497541</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.079066386</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig-group id="fig5"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> The graph of the exact solution and ADM solution at t = 0.1, t = 0.3 and t = 0.5.</title></caption><fig id ="fig5_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x126.png"/></fig></fig-group><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> The absolute error when t = 0.03, t = 0.05 and t = 0.1</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >X</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Absolute Error at t = 0.03</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Absolute Error at t = 0.05</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Absolute Error at t = 0.1</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+0.0000225</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+0.0001046</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+0.0008482</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+0.0000241</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+0.0001110</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+0.0009063</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+0.0000311</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+0.0001338</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+0.0010460</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+0.0000471</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+0.0001822</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+0.0013000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+0.0000746</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+0.0002630</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+0.0016955</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+0.0001173</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+0.0003844</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+0.0022619</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> The graph of the exact solution and new modification solution at t = 0.03, t = 0.05 and t = 0.</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x127.png"/></fig></sec></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. The Improved Adomian Decomposition Method</title><sec id="s6_1"><title>6.1. The Method</title><p>In our new calculation, the complex system given in Equation (1) in converted into a real system by writing</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula130"><label>(6.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x128.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x130.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are real functions. By substituting Equation (6.1) into Equation (2.1), we obtain the following system</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula131"><label>(6.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x131.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula132"><label>(6.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x132.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x133.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> In an operator form, Equations (6.2) and (6.3) become</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula133"><label>(6.4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x134.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula134"><label>(6.5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x135.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Applying the inverse operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x137.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to both sides of (6.4) and (6.5) gives</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula135"><label>(6.6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x138.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula136"><label>(6.7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x139.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Assumes that, the nonlinear terms in (6.6) and (6.7) are represented by the following series</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula137"><label>(6.8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x140.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula138"><label>(6.9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x141.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x143.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are Adomian polynomials. Substituting the nonlinear terms (6.8) and (6.9) and the solution form (6.4) and (6.3) into (6.6) and (6.7) gives</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula139"><label>(6.10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x144.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula140"><label>(6.11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x145.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Following the decomposition analysis, we introduce the recursive relative</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula141"><label>(6.12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x146.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula142"><label>(6.13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x147.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula143"><label>(6.14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x148.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula144"><label>(6.15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x149.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Adomian polynomials are calculated as follows</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula145"><label>(6.16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x150.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula146"><label>(6.17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x151.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula147"><label>(6.18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x152.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Similarly we can calculate <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x154.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x154.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x155.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Now, the first components from Equations (6.12)-(6.15) can be determined. Substituting these values into Equations (6.2) and (6.3), we can obtain the expression of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x154.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x155.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x157.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x154.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x155.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x157.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x159.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> , the closed form solutions yield from Equations (6.1).</p></sec><sec id="s6_2"><title>6.2. Test Problems</title><p>The method is applied to the two above examples.</p><p>1) Solution of Example 5.1 with IADM</p><p>We consider Schrodinger Equation (5.7) with its initial condition. In our calculation we will convert the complex equation given in Equation (5.7) into a real system by writing</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula148"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x160.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula149"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x161.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>As we explain above we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula150"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x162.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula151"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x163.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula152"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x164.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula153"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x165.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The numerical results obtained with IADM are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>.</p><p>In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>, it is presented the modulus <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x166.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of the IADM solution of NLS with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x166.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x167.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and velocity <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x166.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x167.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x168.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x166.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x167.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x168.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x169.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>2) Solution of Example 5.2 with IADM</p><p>We consider following Schrodinger equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula154"><label>(6.19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x170.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>With initial and boundary condition <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x172.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> . This problem has an exact solution <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x172.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x174.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> In our calculation, we will convert the complex equation given in Equation (6.19) into a real system by writing</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula155"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x176.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula156"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x177.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>As is explained above, the iterative relation is obtained as</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title>The absolute error when x = 10</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Improve ADM</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.6052711 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8421550 &#215; 10<sup>−7</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.1449535 &#215; 10<sup>−7</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.3689919 &#215; 10<sup>−7</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000001151433</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig-group id="fig7"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref></label><caption><title> The graph of the approximate solution (IADM) for example 1.</title></caption><fig id ="fig7_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x178.png"/></fig></fig-group><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula157"><label>(6.20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x179.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula158"><label>(6.21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x180.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula159"><label>(6.22)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x181.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula160"><label>(6.23)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x182.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Adomian polynomials are calculated as follows</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula161"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x183.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula162"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x184.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula163"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x185.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Similarly we can calculate<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x186.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x186.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x187.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> . Now, the first components can be determined.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula164"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x190.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula165"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x191.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula166"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x192.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula167"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x193.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula168"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x194.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72985-formula169"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x195.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The results are mentioned in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref> with only two components<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-1720745x196.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> The absolute error when x = 10</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Improve ADM</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6680003 &#215; 10<sup>−7</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000005331568</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000404691114</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001704381222</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0005197377272</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></sec><sec id="s7"><title>7. Conclusion</title><p>In this work, it is shown how the Adomian decomposition method and some of its modification can be adapted in order to be used to the nonlinear Schrodinger. The new method presented in this work has a powerful and easy use. The numerical technique is improved by decomposition of the nonlinear operator. In applying the improved Adomian decomposition Method (IADM) to the nonlinear Schrodinger equation, it is found that the method gives accurate results with lesser computational effort as compared with other modification.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Conflict of Interest</title><p>The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Al-Shareef, A., Al Qarni, A.A., Al-Mohalbadi, S. and Bakodah, H.O. (2016) Soliton Solutions and Numerical Treatment of the Nonlinear Schrodinger’s Equation Using Modified Adomian Decomposition Method. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 4, 2215-2232. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2016.412215</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.72985-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eslami, M., Mirzazadeh, M., Vajargah, B.F. and Biswas, A. (2014) Optical Solitons for the Resonant Nonlinear Schr&amp;oumldinger’s Equation with Time-Dependent Coefficients by the First Integral Method. Optik—International Journal for Light and Electron Optics, 125, 3107-3116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2014.01.013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72985-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Crutcher, S.H., Osei, A.J. and Biswas, A. (2013) Wobbling Phenomena with Logarithmic Law Nonlinear Schr&amp;oumldinger Equations for Incoherent Spatial Gaussons. Optik—International Journal for Light and Electron Optics, 124, 4793-4797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2013.01.081</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72985-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Triki, H., Hayat, T., Aldossary, O.M. and Biswas, A. (2012) Bright and Dark Solitons for the Resonant Nonlinear Schr&amp;oumldinger’s Equation with Time-Dependent Coefficients. Optics &amp; Laser Technology, 44, 2223-2231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2012.01.037</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72985-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Biswas, A. and Milovic, D. (2009) Travelling Wave Solutions of the Non-Linear Schr&amp;oumldinger’s Equation in Non-Kerr Law Media. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 14, 1993-1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2008.04.017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72985-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lott, D.A., Henriquez, A., Sturdevant, B.J.M. and Biswas, A. (2009) A Numerical Study of Optical Soliton-Like Structures Resulting from the Nonlinear Schr&amp;oumldinger’s Equation with Square-Root Law Nonlinearity. Mathematics and Computation, 207, 319-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2008.10.038</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72985-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mirzazadeh, M., Eslami, M., Vajargah, B.F. and Biswas, A. (2014) Optical Solitons and Optical Rogons of Generalized Resonant Dispersive Nonlinear Schr&amp;oumldinger’s Equation with Power Law Nonlinearity. Optik—International Journal for Light and Electron Optics, 125, 4246-4256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2014.04.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72985-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Masemola, P., Kara, A.H. and Biswas, A. (2013) Optical Solitons and Conservation Laws for Driven Nonlinear Schr&amp;oumldinger’s Equation with Linear Attenuation and Detuning. Optics &amp; Laser Technology, 45, 402-405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2012.06.017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72985-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Biswas, A., Moran, A., Milovic, D., Majid, F. and Biswas, K.C. (2010) An Exact Solution for the Modified Nonlinear Schr&amp;oumldinger’s Equation for Davydov Solitons in α-Helix Proteins. Mathematical Biosciences, 227, 68-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2010.05.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72985-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Biswas, A. and Milovic, D. (2010) Bright and Dark Solitons of the Generalized Nonlinear Schr&amp;oumldinger’s Equation. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 15, 1473-1484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2009.06.017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72985-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Biswas, A (2009) 1-Soliton Solution of 1 + 2 Dimensional Nonlinear Schr&amp;oumldinger’s Equation in Power Law Media. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 14, 1830-1833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2008.08.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72985-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Weizhong, D. (1992) An Unconditionally Stability Three-Level Explicit Difference Scheme for the Schr&amp;oumldinger Equation with a Variable Coefficient. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 29, 174-181. https://doi.org/10.1137/0729011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72985-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chan, I.T.E, Lee, D. and Shen, L. (1986) Stable Explicit Scheme for Equation of the Schr&amp;oumldinger Type. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 23, 274-281. https://doi.org/10.1137/0723019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72985-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Wazwaz</surname><given-names> A.M. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2001</year>)<article-title>A Reliable Technique for Solving Linear and Nonlinear Schrodinger Equations by Adomian Decomposition Method</article-title><source> Bulletin of the Institute of Mathematics Academia Sinica</source><volume> 29</volume>,<fpage> 125</fpage>-<lpage>134</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72985-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sadighi, A. and Ganji, D.D. (2008) Analytic Treatment of Linear and Nonlinear Schr&amp;oumldinger Equations: A Study with Homotopy-Perturbation and Adomian Decomposition Methods. Physics Letters A, 372, 465-469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2007.07.065</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72985-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mezban, M.O. and Shnnan, A.K. (2009) Adomian’s Decomposition Method for Solving One Dimensional Schr&amp;oumldinger Equation. Journal of Basrah Researches (Sciences), 35, 5-11.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72985-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kumar, A. and Pankaj, R.D. (2013) Solitary Wave Solutions of Schr&amp;oumldinger Equation by Laplace-Adomian Decomposition Method. Physical Review &amp; Research International, 3, 702-712.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72985-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Maitama</surname><given-names> S. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2014</year>)<article-title>A New Approach to Linear and Nonlinear Schrodinger Equations Using the Natural Decomposition Method</article-title><source> International Mathematical Forum</source><volume> 9</volume>,<fpage> 835</fpage>-<lpage>847</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72985-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wazwaz, A.M. (1999) The Modified Decomposition Method and Padé Approximants for Solving the Thomas-Fermi Equation. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 105, 11-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0096-3003(98)10090-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72985-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wazwaz, A.M. (1999) A Reliable Modification of Adomian Decomposition Method. Applied Mathematics and Computa-tion, 102, 77-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0096-3003(98)10024-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72985-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wazwaz, A.M. (2005) Adomian Decomposition Method for a Reliable Treatment of the Edman-Flower Equation. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 161, 543-560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2003.12.048</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72985-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adomian, G. and Rach, R. (1991) Linear and Nonlinear Schr&amp;oumldinger Equations. Foundations of Physics, 21, 983-991.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72985-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wazwaz, A.M. and El-Sayed, S.M. (2001) A New Modification of the Adomian Decomposition Method for Linear and Nonlinear Operators. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 122, 393-405. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0096-3003(00)00060-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72985-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Argyris, J. and Haase, M. (1987) An Engineer’s Guide to Soliton Phenomena: Application of the Finite Element Method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 61, 71-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(87)90117-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72985-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sanz-Serna, J.M. (1986) Conservative and Nonconservative Schemes for the Solution of the Non-Linear Schrodinger Equation. IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, 6, 25-42. https://doi.org/10.1093/imanum/6.1.25</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>