<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    ojcm
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Open Journal of Composite Materials
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2164-5612
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2164-5655
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/ojcm.2025.152004
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    ojcm-140485
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Chemistry 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Materials Science
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Enhancing the Durability of Asphalt Mixtures through Eggshell Powder Incorporation: Towards a Bio-Based and Sustainable Alternative
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Guy Oyéniran
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Adéoti
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Sèna Peace
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Hounkpe
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Koligouka Bertrand
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Ayeko
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="aff1">
    <addr-line>
     aDepartment of Civil Engineering, Higher National School of Public Works (ENSTP), Abomey, Republic of Benin
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff2">
    <addr-line>
     aLaboratory of Testing and Studies in Civil Engineering (L2EGC), Department of Zou, National University of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (UNSTIM), Abomey, Republic of Benin
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     11
    </day> 
    <month>
     02
    </month>
    <year>
     2025
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    15
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    02
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    59
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    94
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      9,
     </day>
     <month>
      November
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      8,
     </day>
     <month>
      November
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      8,
     </day>
     <month>
      February
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    This study explores the innovative use of dried eggshell powder (ESP) as a bio-based filler in asphalt mixtures, aiming to improve resistance to moisture damage while reducing environmental impact. By partially substituting conventional limestone fillers with ESP, the research evaluates mechanical and durability properties under various substitution ratios. Laboratory tests, including Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), X-Ray Diffraction (XRD), and water absorption measurements, were conducted to characterize ESP. Asphalt mixtures were tested for moisture susceptibility, stability, and resistance to freeze-thaw cycles. Results demonstrate that mixtures incorporating 7% ESP achieved superior performance, with enhanced compaction, reduced permeability, and improved durability under wet conditions. These findings suggest that ESP offers a sustainable alternative filler for road construction, contributing to circular economy objectives and the reduction of construction waste.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Asphalt Mixtures
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Eggshell Powder
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Sustainable Construction
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Moisture Resistance
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Calcium Carbonate
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Durability
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Bio-Based Filler
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>Road infrastructure plays a fundamental role in the economic and social development of nations by ensuring connectivity, trade, and community progress. However, maintaining the durability of road infrastructure remains a significant challenge due to considerable environmental, economic, and technical constraints. Asphalt mixtures, comprising aggregates, bitumen, and fillers, are the most widely used materials for road construction worldwide due to their superior performance and adaptability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-1">
     [1]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-2">
     [2]
    </xref>. Despite their effectiveness, these materials are susceptible to severe degradation caused by factors such as moisture, thermal cycles, and fatigue loads, leading to issues like stripping, cracking, and rutting <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-3">
     [3]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-4">
     [4]
    </xref>. Among these factors, moisture is one of the most destructive as it rapidly deteriorates the bond between bitumen and aggregates, compromising pavement durability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-5">
     [5]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-7">
     [7]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>The sensitivity of asphalt mixtures to moisture is strongly influenced by their formulation, particularly the characteristics of the fillers used <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-8">
     [8]
    </xref>. Conventional fillers, such as limestone, cement, and lime, play a critical role in enhancing compaction and cohesion. However, their production is associated with high costs, intensive consumption of non-renewable resources, and significant greenhouse gas emissions, particularly in regions like Benin, where limestone reserves are heavily exploited <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-9">
     [9]
    </xref>. These limitations underscore the need for alternative solutions that are both accessible and environmentally sustainable.</p>
   <p>In this context, the use of organic waste as construction material is emerging as a promising solution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-10">
     [10]
    </xref>. Eggshells, an abundant byproduct of the food industry, offer significant potential due to their high calcium carbonate (CaCO<sub>3</sub>) content, a compound with properties similar to conventional fillers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-11">
     [11]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-12">
     [12]
    </xref>. Repurposing these organic wastes as powder can reduce the environmental footprint of asphalt mixtures while improving their performance, particularly in terms of moisture resistance <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-13">
     [13]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-16">
     [16]
    </xref>. This approach aligns with circular economy principles, contributing to waste reduction and more sustainable use of natural resources.</p>
   <p>Eggshells are abundant and primarily composed of calcium carbonate (CaCO<sub>3</sub>), making them comparable to limestone in properties. Utilizing dried eggshell powder (ESP) as a filler aligns with circular economy principles by reducing environmental impacts and diverting waste from landfills. This study explores the innovative potential of ESP to enhance moisture resistance and durability in asphalt mixtures, addressing challenges such as stripping and cracking caused by water infiltration.</p>
   <p>Incorporating ESP into asphalt formulations presents a technical and ecological innovation that addresses the durability challenges faced by the road construction sector. By filling voids in the asphalt matrix, ESP improves compaction, reduces permeability, and mitigates moisture-induced damage <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-17">
     [17]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-18">
     [18]
    </xref>. Moreover, using this bio-based material offers a viable alternative to conventional fillers, particularly in regions where eggshells are abundantly produced, thereby reducing production costs and environmental impacts <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-19">
     [19]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-21">
     [21]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>By applying the Fuller-Thompson gradation model to optimize compaction, this research offers robust scientific evidence highlighting the benefits of this alternative material. It aims to promote innovative and sustainable solutions for road infrastructure design while emphasizing the valorization of abundant and underutilized organic waste <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-22">
     [22]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-23">
     [23]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>The findings of this research address a pressing question in sustainable road construction: to what extent can the incorporation of ESP improve the moisture resistance, durability, and environmental sustainability of asphalt mixtures? By integrating this underutilized organic waste into road construction practices, this study contributes to circular economy goals, reduces waste, and offers an innovative pathway for eco-friendly infrastructure development.</p>
   <p>By addressing a critical question in sustainable road construction—how does incorporating dried eggshell powder into asphalt formulations improve moisture resistance, enhance durability, and reduce environmental impact?—this research has the potential to not only transform road construction practices but also drive the adoption of more environmentally friendly solutions in infrastructure development.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Literature Review</title>
   <sec id="s2_1">
    <title>2.1. Asphalt Mixtures: Composition, Role of Bitumen, and Challenges in Road Infrastructure</title>
    <p>Asphalt mixtures remain indispensable in modern road construction due to their exceptional mechanical resistance, durability, and ability to bear significant traffic loads. These materials primarily comprise aggregates ((90% - 95%) by weight) and bitumen (5% - 10%), with bitumen acting as a viscoelastic binder that ensures cohesion and impermeability. The performance and longevity of asphalt mixtures are strongly influenced by the quality of these components, particularly the cohesion provided by bitumen <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-24">
      [24]
     </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-27">
      [27]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>Aggregates, which form the structural backbone of asphalt mixtures, may be natural (gravel, sand, crushed stone) or recycled. Their gradation plays a pivotal role in optimizing performance, as it minimizes voids, enhances compactness, and improves stability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-28">
      [28]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-29">
      [29]
     </xref>. The Fuller-Thompson gradation model is often employed to achieve optimal particle packing, maximizing density and mechanical strength <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-25">
      [25]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-30">
      [30]
     </xref>. Bitumen, derived from petroleum, coats the aggregates to ensure viscoelastic behavior essential for resisting mechanical stresses and environmental conditions. Furthermore, its impermeable properties protect underlying pavement layers from water infiltration, a leading cause of structural degradation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-13">
      [13]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-31">
      [31]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>Despite its advantages, the use of bitumen is not without challenges. Its petrochemical origin is associated with significant greenhouse gas emissions, and its sensitivity to temperature extremes can result in plastic deformation under high temperatures and cracking under low temperatures. Advances such as polymer-modified bitumen (PMB), incorporating materials like SBS (styrene-butadiene-styrene) and SBR (styrene-butadiene rubber), have improved its resistance to fatigue, thermal variations, and moisture-induced stripping <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-32">
      [32]
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_2">
    <title>2.2. Moisture Resistance: A Critical Factor in Durability</title>
    <p>Moisture infiltration is one of the most detrimental factors affecting asphalt mixtures. It compromises adhesion between bitumen and aggregates, leading to stripping, cracking, and deformation over time <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-2">
      [2]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-32">
      [32]
     </xref>. The phenomenon of stripping occurs when water displaces bitumen from aggregate surfaces, weakening the cohesive bond and reducing the mixture’s structural integrity. Hydrophilic aggregates, such as those rich in silica, exacerbate this issue, while hydrophobic aggregates, such as limestone, exhibit superior resistance to water infiltration <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-13">
      [13]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-31">
      [31]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>Freeze-thaw cycles amplify moisture-induced damage, particularly in climates with significant temperature fluctuations. Water trapped within asphalt voids expands upon freezing, exerting internal pressures that create cracks and allow further water ingress, accelerating degradation and pothole formation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-13">
      [13]
     </xref>. To mitigate these effects, formulations must optimize aggregate gradation for maximum compactness, thereby reducing voids and limiting water pathways <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-22">
      [22]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>The rheological and physical properties of bitumen are equally crucial. Modified bitumen, incorporating anti-stripping agents or polymers, enhances adhesion and flexibility, reducing the likelihood of moisture-related damage under thermal and mechanical stress <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-32">
      [32]
     </xref>. These innovations underscore the necessity of exploring alternative materials to bolster asphalt mixtures against environmental challenges.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_3">
    <title>2.3. Innovative Materials for Enhancing Asphalt Performance</title>
    <p>The quest for sustainable and high-performance road materials has prompted extensive research into alternative solutions. Biosourced and recycled materials offer promising avenues to improve asphalt durability while addressing environmental concerns.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Materials, Equipment, and Methods</title>
   <p>This section provides a detailed overview of the materials, preparation processes, and experimental methods used to evaluate the performance of asphalt mixtures modified with eggshell powder (ESP). The study investigates the feasibility of incorporating ESP as a sustainable alternative to conventional limestone fillers in asphalt applications.</p>
   <p>By focusing on both mechanical performance and environmental advantages, the research aims to explore the role of ESP in enhancing the durability, moisture resistance, and sustainability of asphalt mixtures. The section outlines the rigorous material characterization techniques employed to understand the chemical, physical, and mechanical properties of ESP, alongside standardized laboratory tests to compare the performance of ESP-modified mixtures with conventional formulations.</p>
   <p>The integrated approach ensures a comprehensive evaluation, combining precise material preparation with established testing protocols to validate ESP’s potential as a viable, eco-friendly filler in the context of modern infrastructure development.</p>
   <sec id="s3_1">
    <title>3.1. Materials</title>
    <p>Conventional asphalt mixtures are the benchmark for road construction due to their durability, mechanical strength, and adaptability to traffic loads. Their performance is governed by three primary components: aggregates, bitumen, and fillers.</p>
    <p>Eggshell powder (ESP) is an agro-industrial byproduct primarily composed of calcium carbonate (CaCO<sub>3</sub>). Its chemical and physical properties make it a promising replacement for conventional fillers.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_2">
    <title>3.2. Materials Preparation</title>
    <p>To ensure consistency and reliability, the preparation of ESP involved meticulous cleaning, drying, grinding, and sieving processes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
      Figure 1
     </xref>).</p>
    <fig id="fig1" position="float">
     <label>Figure 1</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 1. Eggshell powder processing.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1810441-rId14.jpeg?20250211021132" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_3">
    <title>3.3. Experimental Tests Methodology</title>
    <p>Three formulations were prepared to evaluate the influence of ESP substitution:</p>
    <fig id="fig2" position="float">
     <label>Figure 2</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 2. ESP Mix (EM).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1810441-rId15.jpeg?20250211021134" />
    </fig>
    <p>The total filler content was set at 7% of the aggregate weight, following the Fuller and Thompson gradation curve <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-36">
      [36]
     </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-38">
      [38]
     </xref>. This ensured optimal compactness and uniform distribution of filler particles.</p>
    <p>Each formulation was mixed in a high-speed laboratory mixer to ensure homogeneity. A controlled temperature environment was maintained to optimize the interaction between the filler, bitumen, and aggregates. The final mixtures were subjected to standardized compaction methods to prepare test specimens (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
      Figure 3
     </xref>).</p>
    <fig id="fig3" position="float">
     <label>Figure 3</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 3. Sample preparation.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1810441-rId16.jpeg?20250211021134" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_4">
    <title>3.4. Testing Procedures</title>
    <p>The performance of the asphalt mixtures was evaluated through a series of standardized tests:</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_5">
    <title>3.5. Characterization of Materials</title>
    <p>This rigorous experimental methodology aims to validate the potential of ESP as a filler in asphalt mixtures. By comparing mechanical, thermal, and moisture resistance properties, this study highlights the feasibility of ESP in sustainable infrastructure applications.</p>
    <p>Objective:</p>
    <p>To identify the chemical composition and crystalline phases of ESP.</p>
    <p>FTIR Procedure</p>
    <p>1) ESP is mixed with potassium bromide (KBr) and pressed into a pellet.</p>
    <p>2) Infrared spectra are recorded to detect functional groups and confirm the presence of CaCO<sub>3</sub>.</p>
    <p>XRD Procedure</p>
    <p>1) ESP is analyzed to determine crystalline phases and purity.</p>
    <p>2) Peaks corresponding to CaCO<sub>3</sub> are identified, providing insights into the filler’s structural properties.</p>
    <p>Objective:</p>
    <p>To ensure ESP meets the required specifications for asphalt fillers.</p>
    <p>Procedure:</p>
    <p>1) Sieving is conducted according to NF EN 933-1, with a sieve stack covering &lt;63 μm and larger sizes. The resulting data verify the filler’s suitability for reducing voids and improving cohesion.</p>
    <p>Objective:</p>
    <p>To evaluate the compaction potential and moisture resistance of ESP.</p>
    <p>Procedure:</p>
    <p>1) Density is measured using a pycnometer (NF EN 1097-6).</p>
    <p>2) Water absorption is calculated by comparing dry and wet sample weights after soaking, using:</p>
    <p>
     <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <mtext>
         Water Absorption 
       </mtext> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          ( 
        </mo> 
        <mtext>
          % 
        </mtext> 
        <mo>
          ) 
        </mo> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mfrac> 
        <mrow> 
         <mtext>
           Wet Mass 
         </mtext> 
         <mo>
           − 
         </mo> 
         <mtext>
           Dry Mass 
         </mtext> 
        </mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mtext>
           Dry Mass 
         </mtext> 
        </mrow> 
       </mfrac> 
       <mo>
         × 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         100 
       </mn> 
      </mrow> 
     </math></p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_6">
    <title>3.6. Testing of Asphalt Mixtures</title>
    <p>Objective:</p>
    <p>To measure load-bearing capacity and flow of asphalt mixtures.</p>
    <p>Procedure:</p>
    <p>Objective:</p>
    <p>To assess tensile strength and cracking resistance.</p>
    <p>Procedure:</p>
    <p>
     <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <msub> 
        <mi>
          σ 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          t 
        </mi> 
       </msub> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mfrac> 
        <mrow> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
         <mi>
           P 
         </mi> 
        </mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mi>
           π 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           D 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           t 
         </mi> 
        </mrow> 
       </mfrac> 
      </mrow> 
     </math></p>
    <p>where:</p>
    <p>- 
     <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mi>
        P 
      </mi> 
     </math> is the applied load,</p>
    <p>- 
     <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mi>
        D 
      </mi> 
     </math> is the diameter, and</p>
    <p>- 
     <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mi>
        t 
      </mi> 
     </math> is the thickness.</p>
    <p>Objective:</p>
    <p>To evaluate the filler’s effect on adhesion under wet conditions.</p>
    <p>Procedure:</p>
    <p>Objective:</p>
    <p>To measure tensile strength retention under moisture exposure.</p>
    <p>Procedure:</p>
    <p>
     <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <mtext>
         ITSR 
       </mtext> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mfrac> 
        <mrow> 
         <mtext>
           Wet Strength 
         </mtext> 
        </mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mtext>
           Dry Strength 
         </mtext> 
        </mrow> 
       </mfrac> 
       <mo>
         × 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         100 
       </mn> 
      </mrow> 
     </math></p>
    <p>Objective:</p>
    <p>To assess resistance to cyclic freezing and thawing.</p>
    <p>Procedure:</p>
    <p>Objective:</p>
    <p>To simulate long-term aging of asphalt mixtures.</p>
    <p>Procedure:</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_7">
    <title>3.7. Formulation Optimization and Analysis</title>
    <p>The results of the preliminary tests informed the optimization of the mix formulations. The 7% filler content, determined through the Fuller and Thompson gradation curve <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-24">
      [24]
     </xref>, was validated for its effectiveness in balancing compactness, mechanical strength, and moisture resistance.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_8">
    <title>3.8. Summary</title>
    <p>The systematic integration of ESP into asphalt mixtures demonstrates its potential as a sustainable alternative filler. By replacing limestone partially or entirely, ESP contributes to improved mechanical performance, enhanced moisture resistance, and reduced environmental impact, aligning with the goals of sustainable road construction.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Results and Discussions</title>
   <sec id="s4_1">
    <title>4.1. Characterization of Aggregates and Bitumen</title>
    <p>The aggregates used in this study include 0/6 sand and 6/10 gravel sourced from the OKUTA quarry in Zangnanado, Benin.</p>
    <p>A series of tests were conducted to evaluate their physical and mechanical properties, focusing on:</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref> summarize the test results assessing the physical and mechanical properties of the materials.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref>: Aggregate characteristics, including mechanical properties such as MDE (%), LA (%), and FI (%), follow the relevant standards (e.g., NF EN 1097-1, NF EN 933-3). The results comply with the specified limits, indicating suitable aggregate performance for the intended application.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref>: Aggregate physical characteristics, such as apparent density and water absorption, are evaluated using NF EN 1097-6 and NF EN 1097-3 standards. The results meet the declared specifications and confirm the materials’ adequacy for construction purposes.</p>
    <p>The results confirm that the 6/10 gravel is highly suitable for producing 0/10 Semi-Dense Bituminous Mixtures (BBSG) for Category 3 road pavements. Specifically:</p>
    <table-wrap id="table1">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
       Table 1
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-"></xref>Table 1. Aggregate characteristics.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="19.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Material</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="23.33%"><p style="text-align:center">Parameter/Test</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="20.89%"><p style="text-align:center">Standard</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="15.78%"><p style="text-align:center">Result</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="20.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Specification</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="19.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Gravel 6/10</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="23.33%"><p style="text-align:center">MDE (%)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="20.89%"><p style="text-align:center">NF EN 1097-1</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.78%"><p style="text-align:center">10.3</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="20.00%"><p style="text-align:center">≤20</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.99%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.33%"><p style="text-align:center">LA (%)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.89%"><p style="text-align:center">NF EN 1097-2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.78%"><p style="text-align:center">24.2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.00%"><p style="text-align:center">≤25</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.99%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.33%"><p style="text-align:center">MDE + LA (%)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.89%"><p style="text-align:center">–</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.78%"><p style="text-align:center">34.5</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.00%"><p style="text-align:center">≤35</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.99%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.33%"><p style="text-align:center">FI (%)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.89%"><p style="text-align:center">NF EN 933-3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.78%"><p style="text-align:center">15.12</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.00%"><p style="text-align:center">≤20</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Sand 0/6</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.33%"><p style="text-align:center">SE (%)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.89%"><p style="text-align:center">NF EN 933-8</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.78%"><p style="text-align:center">60.2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.00%"><p style="text-align:center">≥45</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <table-wrap id="table2">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
       Table 2
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-"></xref>Table 2. Aggregate physical characteristics.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="19.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Material</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="31.56%"><p style="text-align:center">Parameter/Test</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="18.78%"><p style="text-align:center">Standard</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="9.66%"><p style="text-align:center">Result</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="20.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Specification &amp; Standard</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="19.99%"><p style="text-align:center">6/10 Gravel</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="31.56%"><p style="text-align:center">Apparent Density (g/cm<sup>3</sup>)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="18.78%"><p style="text-align:center">NF EN 1097-6</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="9.66%"><p style="text-align:center">2.73</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="20.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Declared, NF EN 13043, Aug 2003</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="31.56%"><p style="text-align:center">Water Absorption (%)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.78%"><p style="text-align:center">NF EN 1097-3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.66%"><p style="text-align:center">1.4</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.00%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="19.99%"><p style="text-align:center">0/6 Sand</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="31.56%"><p style="text-align:center">Apparent Density (g/cm<sup>3</sup>)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.78%"><p style="text-align:center">NF EN 1097-6</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.66%"><p style="text-align:center">2.72</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Declared</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="31.56%"><p style="text-align:center">Water Absorption (%)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.78%"><p style="text-align:center">NF EN 1097-3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.66%"><p style="text-align:center">1.58</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.00%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>In summary, the 6/10 gravel from the OKUTA quarry exhibits the uniformity and quality required for producing stable and durable asphalt mixtures for secondary road surfaces.</p>
    <p>The results indicate that the 6/10 gravel complies with the specifications, ensuring durability and suitability for the formulation of semi-dense asphalt concrete (SDAC).</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">
      Figure 4
     </xref> illustrates the particle size distribution curves of the aggregates.</p>
    <p>The harmonious gradation of the 0/6 and 6/10 classes ensures optimal compaction and good cohesion in the mixture.</p>
    <p>The gradation curves for the 0/6 sand and 6/10 gravel are depicted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">
      Figure 4
     </xref>, which illustrates the particle size distribution based on sieve analysis.</p>
    <p>Key Insights:</p>
    <fig id="fig4" position="float">
     <label>Figure 4</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 4. Gradation curves of aggregates.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1810441-rId29.jpeg?20250211021151" />
    </fig>
    <p>The bitumen used in this study is a 35/50-grade binder supplied by CHELL TOGO (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">
      Figure 5
     </xref>). Samples were collected from the ADEOTI S.A. facility in Adjura, near Porto-Novo, Benin. The bitumen underwent standard testing to evaluate:</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref> summarizes the results of its characterization.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table3">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
       Table 3
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-"></xref>Table 3. Characteristics of 35/50 Bitumen.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">Test</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">Result</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">Unit</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">Penetration at 25˚C</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">1.03</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">1/10 mm</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">Softening Point</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">54.10</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">˚C</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">Density</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">38.00</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">g/cm<sup>3</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <fig id="fig5" position="float">
     <label>Figure 5</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 5. 35/50 Bitumen.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1810441-rId30.jpeg?20250211021152" />
    </fig>
    <p>Penetration at 25˚C:</p>
    <p>The low penetration value confirms the binder’s hardness, making it suitable for heavily trafficked wearing courses.</p>
    <p>Softening Point:</p>
    <p>The high softening point ensures resistance to deformation at elevated temperatures, reducing risks of rutting and flow.</p>
    <p>Density:</p>
    <p>The density aligns with typical values for 35/50-grade bitumen, contributing to the mix’s structural integrity and compaction.</p>
    <p>The results comply with NF EN 12591 standards, confirming that the 35/50 bitumen is suitable for wearing courses subjected to heavy loads.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_2">
    <title>4.2. Physical and Chemical Characterization of Eggshell Powder (ESP)</title>
    <p>FTIR spectra confirmed the dominance of calcium carbonate in ESP, with characteristic absorption peaks at 1415 cm<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> and 875 cm<sup>−1</sup>. XRD analysis corroborated this finding, showing calcite as the primary crystalline phase. The bulk density of ESP was 2.62 g/cm<sup>3</sup>, and its water absorption was lower than that of limestone filler, indicating potential for reduced permeability in asphalt mixtures.</p>
    <p>The gradation analysis reveals that powdered eggshells are dominated by fine particles. This distribution is advantageous for their function as a filler in bituminous mixtures. The fines effectively fill voids between aggregates, increasing compaction and reducing water permeability—both critical factors in asphalt pavement durability.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
      Table 4
     </xref> presents the cumulative particle size distribution of ESP.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table4">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
       Table 4
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-"></xref>Table 4. Particle size distribution of ESP.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Sieve Size (mm)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Retained Mass (g)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="30.90%"><p style="text-align:center">Cumulative Retained Mass (g)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="19.11%"><p style="text-align:center">Passing (%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:center">2.00</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:center">0</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="30.90%"><p style="text-align:center">0</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="19.11%"><p style="text-align:center">100</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:center">0.00</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:center">2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.90%"><p style="text-align:center">2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.11%"><p style="text-align:center">98</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:center">0.06</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:center">10</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.90%"><p style="text-align:center">12</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.11%"><p style="text-align:center">90</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>The gradation curve (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">
      Figure 6
     </xref>) highlights the predominance of fine particles (&lt;63 μm), making ESP suitable for filling voids between aggregates and improving compactness.</p>
    <p>Compaction and Mechanical Strength: The high proportion of fine particles (&lt;63 μm) in EPS enhances the compactness of the mixture, translating into improved mechanical strength and extended durability. These fine particles fill inter-aggregate voids, distributing loads more effectively.</p>
    <p>Water Permeability: The predominance of fines significantly reduces water permeability, mitigating the risk of stripping and moisture-induced damage.</p>
    <fig id="fig6" position="float">
     <label>Figure 6</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 6. Gradation curves of ESP.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1810441-rId31.jpeg?20250211021154" />
    </fig>
    <p>Aggregate-Binder Adhesion: The dense gradation provided by EPS improves the adhesion between the binder and aggregates, creating a robust and moisture-resistant matrix. This is particularly critical in climates with high precipitation or freeze-thaw cycles.</p>
    <p>Fillers used in asphalt mixtures must meet stringent gradation criteria to ensure optimal performance. According to standards such as NF EN 933-10, an effective filler should exhibit a high proportion of fine particles (≤60 μm) to enhance compaction and reduce moisture sensitivity. The gradation results for EPS align well with these requirements, validating its suitability as a filler.</p>
    <p>The gradation analysis demonstrates that EPS can serve as an effective filler in asphalt mixtures, offering both performance and sustainability benefits.</p>
    <p>Key advantages include:</p>
    <p>The XRD analysis (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
      Table 5
     </xref>) reveals the predominance of calcium carbonate (CaCO<sub>3</sub>) in the form of calcite. The results are displayed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">
      Figure 7
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>XRD analysis confirms that powdered eggshells are primarily composed of calcium carbonate (CaCO<sub>3</sub>) in its crystalline calcite form. The most intense peaks, observed at 23.1˚C, 29.4˚C, and 36.1˚C, affirm calcite as the dominant phase. Additionally, minor traces of magnesite (MgCO<sub>3</sub>) and aragonite (another form of CaCO<sub>3</sub>) are detected. These secondary phases, while present in small quantities, do not significantly affect the properties of ESP as a filler.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table5">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
       Table 5
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-"></xref>Table 5. XRD analysis results of ESP.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">Diffraction Angle (2θ)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="29.39%"><p style="text-align:center">Relative Intensity (%)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="37.27%"><p style="text-align:center">Identified Mineral</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">23.1</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="29.39%"><p style="text-align:center">100.0</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="37.27%"><p style="text-align:center">Calcite (CaCO<sub>3</sub>)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">0.4</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.39%"><p style="text-align:center">95.0</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.27%"><p style="text-align:center">Calcite (CaCO<sub>3</sub>)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">0.1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.39%"><p style="text-align:center">65.0</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.27%"><p style="text-align:center">Calcite (CaCO<sub>3</sub>)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">0.4</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.39%"><p style="text-align:center">50.0</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.27%"><p style="text-align:center">Calcite (CaCO<sub>3</sub>)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">0.3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.39%"><p style="text-align:center">30.0</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.27%"><p style="text-align:center">Traces of Magnesite (MgCO<sub>3</sub>)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">0.5</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.39%"><p style="text-align:center">20.0</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.27%"><p style="text-align:center">Traces of Aragonite (CaCO<sub>3</sub>)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">0.3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.39%"><p style="text-align:center">10.0</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.27%"><p style="text-align:center">Minor Impurities</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <fig id="fig7" position="float">
     <label>Figure 7</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 7. XRD spectrum of ESP.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1810441-rId32.jpeg?20250211021155" />
    </fig>
    <p>Implications for Asphalt Mixtures</p>
    <p>Mechanical Strength and Cohesion: The calcite-dominant composition improves the mechanical strength and cohesion of asphalt mixtures, ensuring structural integrity under heavy loads.</p>
    <p>Durability: The absence of significant impurities ensures high compatibility with bitumen, reducing the likelihood of adverse reactions and enhancing long-term performance.</p>
    <p>Sustainability: By utilizing a renewable and biodegradable material like eggshells, ESP offers an eco-friendly alternative to conventional limestone fillers.</p>
    <p>The results confirm the chemical purity of ESP and its potential as a substitute for traditional limestone fillers.</p>
    <p>The FTIR analysis (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">
      Table 6
     </xref>) identifies characteristic carbonate bands, confirming the predominance of calcite. The results are illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">
      Figure 8
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">
      Table 6
     </xref> below summarizes key infrared absorption peaks observed in powdered eggshells (ESP), indicating its chemical composition. The results highlight the dominance of calcium carbonate (CaCO<sub>3</sub>) and minor traces of organic or residual water content.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table6">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">
       Table 6
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-"></xref>Table 6. FTIR results of ESP.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="6.62%"><p style="text-align:center">Peak No.</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.77%"><p style="text-align:center">Wavelength (cm<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="11.40%"><p style="text-align:center">Intensity (%)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="35.23%"><p style="text-align:center">Functional Group</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="31.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Chemical Attribution</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="6.62%"><p style="text-align:center">1</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.77%"><p style="text-align:center">712</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="11.40%"><p style="text-align:center">80.0</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="35.23%"><p style="text-align:center"> 
         <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
           <msubsup> 
            <mrow> 
             <mtext>
               CO 
             </mtext> 
            </mrow> 
            <mn>
              3 
            </mn> 
            <mrow> 
             <mn>
               2 
             </mn> 
             <mo>
               − 
             </mo> 
            </mrow> 
           </msubsup> 
          </mrow> 
         </math> (Out-of-plane bending)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="31.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Carbonate (CaCO<sub>3</sub>, Calcite)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="6.62%"><p style="text-align:center">2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.77%"><p style="text-align:center">875</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.40%"><p style="text-align:center">85.0</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="35.23%"><p style="text-align:center"> 
         <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
           <msubsup> 
            <mrow> 
             <mtext>
               CO 
             </mtext> 
            </mrow> 
            <mn>
              3 
            </mn> 
            <mrow> 
             <mn>
               2 
             </mn> 
             <mo>
               − 
             </mo> 
            </mrow> 
           </msubsup> 
          </mrow> 
         </math> (In-plane bending)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="31.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Carbonate (CaCO<sub>3</sub>, Calcite)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="6.62%"><p style="text-align:center">3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.77%"><p style="text-align:center">1420</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.40%"><p style="text-align:center">70.0</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="35.23%"><p style="text-align:center"> 
         <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
           <msubsup> 
            <mrow> 
             <mtext>
               CO 
             </mtext> 
            </mrow> 
            <mn>
              3 
            </mn> 
            <mrow> 
             <mn>
               2 
             </mn> 
             <mo>
               − 
             </mo> 
            </mrow> 
           </msubsup> 
          </mrow> 
         </math> (Symmetric stretching)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="31.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Carbonate (CaCO<sub>3</sub>, Calcite)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="6.62%"><p style="text-align:center">4</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.77%"><p style="text-align:center">1640</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.40%"><p style="text-align:center">50.0</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="35.23%"><p style="text-align:center">H<sub>2</sub>O (Bending vibration)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="31.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Residual moisture</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="6.62%"><p style="text-align:center">5</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.77%"><p style="text-align:center">2850 - 2950</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.40%"><p style="text-align:center">40.0</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="35.23%"><p style="text-align:center">C-H (Symmetric stretching)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="31.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Traces of organics</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="6.62%"><p style="text-align:center">6</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.77%"><p style="text-align:center">3400</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.40%"><p style="text-align:center">60.0</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="35.23%"><p style="text-align:center">O-H (Stretching vibration)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="31.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Bound water/moisture</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <fig id="fig8" position="float">
     <label>Figure 8</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 8. FTIR spectrum of ESP.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1810441-rId37.jpeg?20250211021156" />
    </fig>
    <p>Calcium Carbonate Confirmation: Peaks at 712, 875, and 1420 cm<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> confirm the dominance of calcium carbonate, which enhances compaction and cohesion in asphalt mixtures.</p>
    <p>Residual Water and Organic Traces: Peaks at 1640 and 2850 - 2950 cm<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> indicate minor water content and residual organic matter. These may necessitate additional drying or treatment to optimize performance in bituminous mixtures.</p>
    <p>The FTIR results reinforce the suitability of ESP as a filler in asphalt mixtures, providing both functional and environmental benefits. Key advantages include:</p>
    <p>These results validate the favorable properties of ESP for improving asphalt compactness and durability.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_3">
    <title>4.3. Asphalt Mix Design</title>
    <p>The granular composition utilized in this study corresponds to an ongoing project conducted at the ADEOTI SA base. In compliance with NF EN 13108-20 (Article 4), which defines the validity period of a mixture formulation and the conditions requiring reformulation, the proportions used were based on the site’s formulation while ensuring adherence to the reference 0/10 grading envelope. This also aligns with the requirements of NF P 98-130 (Article 6.1), which mandates adherence to the grading curve specifications for semi-dense bituminous mixtures (BBSG).</p>
    <p>The selected aggregate percentages are illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">
      Figure 9
     </xref>.</p>
    <fig id="fig9" position="float">
     <label>Figure 9</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 9. Proportions of different aggregate fractions in the mixture.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1810441-rId38.jpeg?20250211021158" />
    </fig>
    <p>The pie chart in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">
      Figure 9
     </xref> highlights the distribution of the various aggregate fractions, comprising sand (0/6), gravel (6/10), and filler.</p>
    <p>The grading curves of the mixture are depicted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig10">
      Figure 10
     </xref>, which includes:</p>
    <p>The results demonstrate that the mixture complies with specifications, as its grading curve lies within the required envelope. Its close alignment with the median curve indicates a well-balanced granular structure, optimized for compaction and stability.</p>
    <fig id="fig10" position="float">
     <label>Figure 10</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 10. Grading analysis of the aggregate mixture.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1810441-rId39.jpeg?20250211021158" />
    </fig>
    <p>Using the Andreasen and Andersen model with a coefficient 
     <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <mi>
         q 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         0.5 
       </mn> 
      </mrow> 
     </math>, the optimal ESP content was estimated at 7%, ensuring a balance between compactness and stability.</p>
    <p>Based on existing literature, the recommended filler proportion for pozzolanic fillers ranges from 1% to 10%, with the most frequently cited range being 1% to 7.5%.</p>
    <p>To optimize compaction, stability, and water resistance for the BBSG, the Andreasen and Andersen model was employed, utilizing a coefficient 
     <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <mi>
         q 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         0.5 
       </mn> 
      </mrow> 
     </math>, as recommended by Fuller and Thompson for achieving optimal compaction. The model is expressed as:</p>
    <p>
     <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <mi>
         P 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          ( 
        </mo> 
        <mi>
          d 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          ) 
        </mo> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         100 
       </mn> 
       <mo>
         × 
       </mo> 
       <msup> 
        <mrow> 
         <mrow> 
          <mo>
            ( 
          </mo> 
          <mrow> 
           <mfrac> 
            <mi>
              d 
            </mi> 
            <mrow> 
             <msub> 
              <mi>
                D 
              </mi> 
              <mrow> 
               <mtext>
                 max 
               </mtext> 
              </mrow> 
             </msub> 
            </mrow> 
           </mfrac> 
          </mrow> 
          <mo>
            ) 
          </mo> 
         </mrow> 
        </mrow> 
        <mi>
          q 
        </mi> 
       </msup> 
      </mrow> 
     </math></p>
    <p>where:</p>
    <p>This approach targets a cumulative gradation curve that maximizes the compaction of the granular skeleton. Applying this model to the BBSG 0/10 grading curve and filler diameter ( 
     <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <mi>
         d 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         0.063 
       </mn> 
       <mtext>
           
       </mtext> 
       <mtext>
         mm 
       </mtext> 
      </mrow> 
     </math>), a calculated filler proportion of 7.94% was obtained. While this value yielded excellent compaction, it did not fully satisfy stability requirements.</p>
    <p>Referring to NF EN 13108-1, which specifies a grading envelope for the 0.063 mm sieve of 2% to 12%, a filler proportion of 7% was chosen. This value, positioned at the center of the normative range, balances compaction and stability effectively.</p>
    <p>To ensure robustness, further tests were conducted by varying filler proportions incrementally by ±0.5% around this value. These variations allowed the identification of an optimal balance between compaction, stability, and water resistance, demonstrating the suitability of the 7% filler proportion.</p>
    <p>The Marshall tests determined an optimal bitumen content of 5.9%, which complies with the specifications outlined in NF EN 13108-1. This optimal content plays a critical role in ensuring enhanced stability and long-term durability of the material.</p>
    <p>According to NF EN 13108-1, the minimum bitumen content for semi-dense hot bituminous mixtures (BBSG) Type 3 with 0/10 granulometry is 5.1%. Based on this reference, a theoretical bitumen content of 5.5% was initially selected, with variations of ±0.5%.</p>
    <p>Marshall Mix Tests were conducted in the laboratory to determine the optimal bitumen content experimentally. The optimal bitumen content was found to be 5.9%, within the admissible variation range (±0.5%) from the theoretical content of 5.5%.</p>
    <p>Key Observations:</p>
    <p>The experimentally determined bitumen content complies with the specifications and ensures an optimized BBSG formulation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig11">
      Figure 11
     </xref>). The Marshall Method was employed and validated to determine the optimal composition that meets both technical requirements and performance criteria. The results confirmed that the formulated bituminous mixture complies with standard specifications while delivering the desired mechanical performance.</p>
    <p>The inclusion of 7% Eggshell Powder (ESP) was identified as yielding the highest water resistance while maintaining stability. Beyond this threshold, performance declined due to the saturation of fines. The addition of ESP significantly enhances durability in wet conditions, an essential consideration for infrastructure longevity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig12">
      Figure 12
     </xref>).</p>
    <fig id="fig11" position="float">
     <label>Figure 11</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 11. Graphical determination of 35/50 binder content.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1810441-rId56.jpeg?20250211021201" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig12" position="float">
     <label>Figure 12</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 12. Evaluation of optimal ESP content using Marshall and Duriez tests.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1810441-rId57.jpeg?20250211021201" />
    </fig>
    <p>Key findings:</p>
    <p>This formulation, incorporating 7% ESP as filler, was selected as the focus for subsequent evaluations.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_4">
    <title>4.4. Performance of Modified Asphalt Mixes</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">
      Table 7
     </xref> below summarizes the results of the indirect tensile strength (ITS) test for various asphalt formulations, including eggshell powder (ESP) as a filler, alongside a reference formulation with 100% limestone filler. The results are expressed in terms of maximum applied force and calculated tensile strength (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig13">
      Figure 13
     </xref>).</p>
    <table-wrap id="table7">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">
       Table 7
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-"></xref>Table 7. Indirect tensile strength results.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="30.89%"><p style="text-align:center">Formulation</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="15.81%"><p style="text-align:center">Diameter (cm)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="16.63%"><p style="text-align:center">Thickness (cm)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="16.51%"><p style="text-align:center">Maximum Force (kN)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="20.17%"><p style="text-align:center">Tensile Strength (MPa)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="30.89%"><p style="text-align:center">Asphalt with 100% Limestone Filler</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.81%"><p style="text-align:center">10</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.63%"><p style="text-align:center">5</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.51%"><p style="text-align:center">15.5</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="20.17%"><p style="text-align:center">0.98</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.89%"><p style="text-align:center">Asphalt with 50% ESP</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.81%"><p style="text-align:center">10</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.63%"><p style="text-align:center">5</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.51%"><p style="text-align:center">17.0</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.17%"><p style="text-align:center">1.07</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.89%"><p style="text-align:center">Asphalt with 100% ESP</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.81%"><p style="text-align:center">10</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.63%"><p style="text-align:center">5</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.51%"><p style="text-align:center">18.3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.17%"><p style="text-align:center">1.15</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Key Observations:</p>
    <fig id="fig13" position="float">
     <label>Figure 13</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 13. Tensile strength of various formulations.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1810441-rId58.jpeg?20250211021203" />
    </fig>
    <p>Implications of Results:</p>
    <p>Tensile strength increases with the proportion of ESP, indicating improved internal cohesion and durability.</p>
    <p>The adhesion test evaluates the ability of bitumen to adhere to aggregates after immersion in water for 24 hours at 60˚C. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">
      Table 8
     </xref> below presents the percentage of bitumen coverage retained after immersion for different asphalt formulations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig14">
      Figure 14
     </xref>).</p>
    <table-wrap id="table8">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">
       Table 8
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-"></xref>Table 8. Adhesion test results (water film method).</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="55.56%"><p style="text-align:center">Formulation</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="44.44%"><p style="text-align:center">Bitumen Coverage (%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="55.56%"><p style="text-align:center">Asphalt with 100% Limestone Filler</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="44.44%"><p style="text-align:center">75</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="55.56%"><p style="text-align:center">Asphalt with 50% ESP</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="44.44%"><p style="text-align:center">82</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="55.56%"><p style="text-align:center">Asphalt with 100% ESP</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="44.44%"><p style="text-align:center">88</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <fig id="fig14" position="float">
     <label>Figure 14</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 14. Bitumen-aggregate adhesion of various formulations.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1810441-rId59.jpeg?20250211021204" />
    </fig>
    <p>Key Observations:</p>
    <p>Implications of Results:</p>
    <p>Marshall stability tests assess the load-bearing capacity and deformation resistance of asphalt formulations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig15">
      Figure 15
     </xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig16">
      Figure 16
     </xref>). The results are summarized below in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">
      Table 9
     </xref>.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table9">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">
       Table 9
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-"></xref>Table 9. Marshall stability test results.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="45.64%"><p style="text-align:center">Formulation</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="34.61%"><p style="text-align:center">Marshall Stability (kN)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="19.75%"><p style="text-align:center">Flow (mm)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="45.64%"><p style="text-align:center">Asphalt with 100% Limestone Filler</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="34.61%"><p style="text-align:center">8.2</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="19.75%"><p style="text-align:center">3.5</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.64%"><p style="text-align:center">Asphalt with 50% ESP</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="34.61%"><p style="text-align:center">8.7</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.75%"><p style="text-align:center">3.2</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.64%"><p style="text-align:center">Asphalt with 100% ESP</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="34.61%"><p style="text-align:center">9.1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.75%"><p style="text-align:center">3.0</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <fig id="fig15" position="float">
     <label>Figure 15</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 15. Marshall stability test samples.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1810441-rId60.jpeg?20250211021205" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig16" position="float">
     <label>Figure 16</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 16. Marshall stability and flow of various formulations.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1810441-rId61.jpeg?20250211021205" />
    </fig>
    <p>Key Observations:</p>
    <p>Implications of Results:</p>
    <table-wrap id="table10">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table10">
       Table 10
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-"></xref>Table 10. Moisture sensitivity (ITSR).</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="35.74%"><p style="text-align:center">Mix Type</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="25.10%"><p style="text-align:center">Dry Strength (MPa)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="24.90%"><p style="text-align:center">Wet Strength (MPa)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.26%"><p style="text-align:center">ITSR (%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="35.74%"><p style="text-align:center">Mix with Limestone Filler</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="25.10%"><p style="text-align:center">1.20</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="24.90%"><p style="text-align:center">0.95</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.26%"><p style="text-align:center">79.2</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="35.74%"><p style="text-align:center">Mix with 50% ESP</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.10%"><p style="text-align:center">1.25</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="24.90%"><p style="text-align:center">1.04</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.26%"><p style="text-align:center">85.2</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="35.74%"><p style="text-align:center">Mix with 100% ESP</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.10%"><p style="text-align:center">1.30</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="24.90%"><p style="text-align:center">1.10</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.26%"><p style="text-align:center">91.0</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>The water sensitivity test measures the resistance of asphalt mixtures to moisture-induced damage, expressed as the Indirect Tensile Strength Ratio (ITSR). The results are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table10">
      Table 10
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>The ITS ratios for RM, BM, and EM were 79.2%, 85.2%, and 91%, respectively, demonstrating that ESP enhances resistance to moisture-induced stripping. The hydrophobic nature of calcium carbonate in ESP likely contributed to improved adhesion between bitumen and aggregates (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig17">
      Figure 17
     </xref>).</p>
    <fig id="fig17" position="float">
     <label>Figure 17</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 17. ITSR of various formulations.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1810441-rId62.jpeg?20250211021206" />
    </fig>
    <p>Key Observations:</p>
    <p>Implications of Results:</p>
    <p>The ITSR improvement demonstrates the enhanced moisture resistance provided by ESP.</p>
    <p>Under freeze-thaw cycles, EM exhibited the highest retained strength (87%), compared to BM (81%) and RM (75%). Marshall stability tests revealed a 12% increase in stability for EM over RM, highlighting the mechanical benefits of ESP incorporation.</p>
    <p>The freeze-thaw cycle test was conducted to evaluate the durability of different asphalt mixtures under repeated freezing and thawing conditions. Formulations incorporating eggshell powder (ESP) as a filler were compared against a reference formulation containing 100% limestone filler. Samples were subjected to 10 freeze-thaw cycles, and the mass loss and tensile strength were measured to assess material degradation and cohesion (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig18">
      Figure 18
     </xref>). The results are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table11">
      Table 11
     </xref>.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table11">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table11">
       Table 11
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-"></xref>Table 11. Results of the freeze-thaw cycle test.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="42.69%"><p style="text-align:center">Formulation</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="19.84%"><p style="text-align:center">Freeze-Thaw Cycles</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="16.96%"><p style="text-align:center">Mass Loss (%)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="20.52%"><p style="text-align:center">Tensile Strength (MPa)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="42.69%"><p style="text-align:center">Asphalt with 100% limestone filler</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="19.84%"><p style="text-align:center">10</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.96%"><p style="text-align:center">1.8</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="20.52%"><p style="text-align:center">0.95</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="42.69%"><p style="text-align:center">Asphalt with 50% eggshell powder</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.84%"><p style="text-align:center">10</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.96%"><p style="text-align:center">1.3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.52%"><p style="text-align:center">1.02</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="42.69%"><p style="text-align:center">Asphalt with 100% eggshell powder</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.84%"><p style="text-align:center">10</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.96%"><p style="text-align:center">1.0</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.52%"><p style="text-align:center">1.08</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <fig id="fig18" position="float">
     <label>Figure 18</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 18. Tensile strength and mass loss of various formulations.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1810441-rId63.jpeg?20250211021206" />
    </fig>
    <p>Analysis of Results:</p>
    <p>Mass Loss:</p>
    <p>Tensile Strength:</p>
    <p>Implications:</p>
    <p>Comparison with Limestone Filler:</p>
    <p>Applications:</p>
    <p>The accelerated aging test was conducted to simulate the long-term performance of asphalt mixtures under high-temperature oxidative conditions. Formulations with varying proportions of eggshell powder (ESP) and limestone filler were exposed to 85˚C for five days. Key parameters, including mass loss, tensile strength, and elongation at break, were measured before and after aging and the key results are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table12">
      Table 12
     </xref> and displayed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig19">
      Figure 19
     </xref>.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table12">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table12">
       Table 12
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-"></xref>Table 12. Aging resistance test results.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="31.52%"><p style="text-align:center">Formulation</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="13.91%"><p style="text-align:center">Mass Loss (%)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="19.26%"><p style="text-align:center">Initial Strength (MPa)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.65%"><p style="text-align:center">Strength after Aging (MPa)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.65%"><p style="text-align:center">Elongation at Break (%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="31.52%"><p style="text-align:center">Mix with Limestone Filler</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="13.91%"><p style="text-align:center">0.9</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="19.26%"><p style="text-align:center">1.00</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.65%"><p style="text-align:center">0.85</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.65%"><p style="text-align:center">10</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="31.52%"><p style="text-align:center">Asphalt with 50% ESP</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.91%"><p style="text-align:center">0.6</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.26%"><p style="text-align:center">1.05</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.65%"><p style="text-align:center">0.92</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.65%"><p style="text-align:center">12</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="31.52%"><p style="text-align:center">Asphalt with 100% ESP</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.91%"><p style="text-align:center">0.4</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.26%"><p style="text-align:center">1.10</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.65%"><p style="text-align:center">0.95</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.65%"><p style="text-align:center">13</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <fig id="fig19" position="float">
     <label>Figure 19</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 19. Comparison of mass loss, tensile strength, and elongation at break for different formulations.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1810441-rId64.jpeg?20250211021207" />
    </fig>
    <p>Mixes with ESP exhibit better resistance to thermal aging.</p>
    <p>Analysis of Results:</p>
    <p>Mass Loss:</p>
    <p>Tensile Strength:</p>
    <p>Elongation at Break:</p>
    <p>Implications:</p>
    <p>Comparison with Limestone Filler:</p>
    <p>Applications:</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_5">
    <title>4.5. Environmental and Economic Benefits</title>
    <p>The utilization of ESP reduces dependence on mined fillers and diverts waste from landfills, aligning with sustainability goals. Economic analyses suggest cost savings in regions with abundant eggshell waste, further incentivizing its adoption.</p>
    <p>The use of eggshell powder (ESP) as a filler in asphalt mixtures offers significant environmental advantages. A life cycle analysis conducted by Xia et al. (2018) demonstrated that different substitution rates of ESP yield substantial reductions in CO<sub>2</sub> emissions:</p>
    <p>These findings highlight a direct correlation between the ESP substitution rate and the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. Higher substitution rates lead to progressively greater reductions, ranging from 5% to 10%, making ESP a viable material for reducing the carbon footprint of asphalt mixtures.</p>
    <p>The economic advantages of using ESP have also been documented. For instance, Dhas and Kamaraj (2016) reported cost savings of 7% in asphalt production with an 8% ESP substitution rate. In our study, the economic and environmental impacts of incorporating ESP were evaluated for substitution rates ranging from 6.5% to 8%, with the results summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table13">
      Table 13
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>The use of ESP contributes to a reduction in CO<sub>2</sub> emissions by up to 9%, as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table13">
      Table 13
     </xref>.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table13">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table13">
       Table 13
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140485-"></xref>Table 13. Environmental and economic impact of ESP.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">ESP Content (%)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">CO<sub>2</sub> Reduction (%)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">Cost Reduction (%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">Control Mixture</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">–</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">–</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">0.5</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">7.92</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">5.69</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">0.0</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">8.33</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">6.12</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">0.5</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">8.75</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">6.56</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">0.0</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">9.16</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">7.00</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>The progressive reduction in CO<sub>2</sub> emissions with increasing ESP substitution rates demonstrates the environmental potential of ESP. Substitution rates of 7.5%-8% are particularly notable, achieving reductions close to 9%. This reduction can be attributed to the replacement of conventional fillers, which are associated with higher carbon footprints, by ESP.</p>
    <p>Similar to the trend in CO<sub>2</sub> reductions, cost savings increase with higher ESP substitution rates. The substitution of traditional fillers with ESP reduces production costs without compromising the mechanical and durability properties of asphalt mixtures. Substitution rates of 7.5% - 8% offer the optimal balance between cost-effectiveness and environmental performance.</p>
    <p>Dual Benefits</p>
    <p>ESP substitution simultaneously reduces CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and production costs, providing a dual advantage. This makes ESP an attractive filler material for achieving sustainability goals in the construction sector.</p>
    <p>Optimal Substitution Rates</p>
    <p>Substitution rates of 7.5% - 8% ESP are identified as optimal, maximizing environmental benefits and cost reductions. These rates strike the best balance between sustainability and economic viability.</p>
    <p>Sustainability in Construction</p>
    <p>The integration of ESP in asphalt production promotes sustainable construction practices by:</p>
    <p>By replacing traditional mineral fillers with ESP, the asphalt industry can significantly enhance its environmental performance while maintaining or improving the quality and durability of road infrastructure.</p>
    <p>These findings confirm ESP’s potential as a sustainable and cost-effective solution for asphalt pavements.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>5. Conclusions</title>
   <p>The development of road infrastructure continues to prioritize mechanical performance and durability. This study focused on improving the properties of asphalt mixtures by incorporating eggshell powder (ESP) as an alternative to conventional mineral fillers. The primary objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of this agricultural by-product in enhancing the performance of asphalt mixtures, contributing to sustainable road construction practices.</p>
   <sec id="s5_1">
    <title>5.1. Key Findings</title>
    <p>Optimized Formulation: Using the Fuller model, five mixtures with varying ESP contents (0%, 6.5%, 7%, 7.5%, and 8%) were tested. Mixtures with ESP content between 1% and 7.5% demonstrated optimal performance, with 7% identified as the most effective proportion for significantly enhancing stability and moisture durability.</p>
    <p>Superior Material Properties:</p>
    <p>Enhanced Durability Under Adverse Conditions:</p>
    <p>Environmental and Economic Benefits:</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s5_2">
    <title>5.2. Implications and Perspectives</title>
    <p>The study demonstrates that eggshell powder can be a sustainable and effective solution for enhancing the performance and durability of asphalt mixtures. By leveraging ESP, road construction can achieve significant improvements in moisture resistance, thermal aging, and mechanical properties, while simultaneously reducing the environmental impact of infrastructure projects.</p>
    <p>Future research should expand to large-scale field applications to evaluate the long-term performance of ESP-modified asphalt under diverse environmental and traffic conditions. Investigations into further refining ESP processing methods, such as additional drying or purification, could enhance its material properties and broaden its application scope.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s5_3">
    <title>5.3. Final Conclusion</title>
    <p>The incorporation of eggshell powder into asphalt mixtures emerges as a high-performance and sustainable alternative for road pavement construction. This innovative approach addresses critical environmental and socio-economic challenges by reducing carbon emissions, lowering production costs, and improving pavement longevity.</p>
    <p>This study concludes that a 7% substitution of conventional fillers with ESP optimizes asphalt performance, delivering enhanced resistance to moisture, freeze-thaw cycles, and thermal aging. The findings highlight ESP’s potential to support the development of durable and eco-friendly road infrastructure in regions like Benin, where it can leverage locally available resources.</p>
    <p>By valorizing agricultural by-products, this research contributes to a broader transition towards eco-responsible civil engineering practices, advancing the goals of sustainability and high-performance transport infrastructure.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s6">
   <title>Acknowledgements</title>
   <p>The authors sincerely acknowledge the financial support provided by the PFCR II/ED-STIM Competitive Funds, 2024 edition, from the National University of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (UNSTIM).</p>
  </sec><sec id="s7">
   <title>Data Availability Statement</title>
   <p>Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s8">
   <title>Funding</title>
   <p>UNSTIM Competitive Funds, 2023 edition of the National University of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (UNSTIM).</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.140485-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Akram, S.E.W. (2021) Effects of Eggshell as a Filler Material on Various Bituminous Mix: A Review. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR), 8, b669-b679. &gt;https://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2107212.pdf 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140485-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Cantot, J.V. (2019) Contribution to the Study of Water Resistance in Asphalt Mixtures: A Multi-Scale Experimental Laboratory Approach from a Model System to Compacted Mixtures. Ecole centrale de Nantes. (In French)&gt;https://theses.hal.science/tel-03738063 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140485-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Traore, Y.B., Messan, A., Hannawi, K., Gerard, J., Prince, W. and Tsobnang, F. (2021) Durability of Lightweight Concrete Using Oil Palm Shell as Aggregates. Open Journal of Civil Engineering, 11, 1-13. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/ojce.2021.111001 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140485-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Oubahdou, Y. (2022) Experimental and Rational Study of Surface Layer Degradation in Pavements. Master’s Thesis, University of Limoges. (In French)&gt;https://theses.hal.science/tel-03771553 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140485-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Omar, H.A., Yusoff, N.I.M., Mubaraki, M. and Ceylan, H. (2020) Effects of Moisture Damage on Asphalt Mixtures. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 7, 600-628. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2020.07.001
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140485-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Perraton, D., Baaj, H., Benedetto, H.D. and Paradis, M. (2003) Évaluation de la résistance à la fatigue des enrobés bitumineux fondée sur l’évolution de l’endommagement du matériau en cours d’essai: Aspects fondamentaux et application à l’enrobé à matrice de pierre. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 30, 902-913. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1139/l03-067
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140485-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Aicha, B. and Briki, M.A. (2020) The Effect of Adding Eggshell Powder and Egg White on the Properties and Durability of Concrete. National Polytechnic School: LAVALEF Laboratory. (In French)&gt;https://repository.enp.edu.dz/jspui/bitstream/123456789/3641/1/BRIKI.Mounir-Abdelkader_BELKAID.Aicha.pdf 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140485-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ciryle, S. and Michel, S. (2016) Eapic Campaign: ‘Water Sensitivity Test’, RGRA (Revue General des Routes et de l’Amenagement). 940. &gt;https://www.idrrim.com/ressources/documents/9/5453-EAPIC-Bilan-campagne-se-rie-14-FR.pdf 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140485-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Xiao, F., Jordan, J. and Amirkhanian, S.N. (2009) Laboratory Investigation of Moisture Damage in Warm-Mix Asphalt Containing Moist Aggregate. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2126, 115-124. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3141/2126-14
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140485-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Goh, H.C. and Ramadhansyah, P.J. (2022) The Influence of Eggshell Powder as Additive on the Physical and Mechanical Properties of Stone Mastic Asphalt. Construction, 2, 79-87. &gt;https://doi.org/10.15282/construction.v2i1.7409
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140485-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mababa, D., Pape Ousmane, D. and Dominique Benoit, D. (2017) Comparative Study on the Effect of Adding Limestone Fillers, Basalt Fillers, and Cement to a Semi-Dense Bituminous Concrete (BBSG). European Journal of Scientific Research, 147. (In French) &gt;https://fr.scribd.com/document/591689266/EJSR-147-3-04 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140485-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ratsarahasina, D.M., Ratsimbazafy, H.M., Robisonarison, G.J., Randrianirainy, H.P.B. and de Dieu Ramaroson, J. (2022) Studies of the Influence of Limestone Filler on the Workability and Shrinkage of Concrete. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies (IJPSAT), 31, 175-185. &gt;https://ijpsat.org/index.php/ijpsat/article/download/4088/2513 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140485-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Razzaq, A.K., Yousif, R.A. and Tayh, S.A. (2018) Characterization of Hot Mix Asphalt Modified by Egg Shell Powder. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology, 11, 481-492. &gt;https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Rana-Yousif/publication/327540664_Characterization_of_hot_mix_asphalt_modified_by_egg_shell_powder/links/5c100cf64585157ac1bb9e10/Characterization-of-hot-mix-asphalt-modified-by-egg-shell-powder.pdf 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140485-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zghair Chfat, A.H., Yaacob, H., Mohd Kamaruddin, N.H., Al-Saffar, Z.H. and Putra Jaya, R. (2024) Effects of Nano Eggshell Powder as a Sustainable Bio-Filler on the Physical, Rheological, and Microstructure Properties of Bitumen. Results in Engineering, 22, Article ID: 102061. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102061
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140485-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Debnath, J. and Singh, K.L. (2024) Performance of Bituminous Concrete Mixes Using Waste Eggshell as a Bitumen Modifier. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1326, Article ID: 012052. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1326/1/012052
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140485-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Modupe, A.E., Fadugba, O.G., Busari, A.A., Adeboje, A.O. and Aladegboye, O.J. (2021) Performance Evaluation of Asphaltic Concrete Incorporating Milled Egg-Shell Ash (Mesa) as Bitumen Strength Modifier and Filler. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1107, Article ID: 012033. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1107/1/012033
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140485-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Nejres, A.M., Mustafa, Y.F. and Aldewachi, H.S. (2020) Evaluation of Natural Asphalt Properties Treated with Egg Shell Waste and Low Density Polyethylene. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 23, 39-45. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2020.1728534
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140485-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Syammaun, T., Husaini, Abdullah, Isya, M. and Rachman, F. (2023) Assessing the Performance of Eggshell Ash as a Sustainable Bitumen Modifier. Transportation Engineering, 13, Article ID: 100196. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.treng.2023.100196
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140485-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Syammaun, T., Husaini, Abdullah, and Isya, M. (2023) Utilization of Eggshells Ash as Additive in Enhancing Physical Properties of Bitumen Binder. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1140, Article ID: 012017. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1140/1/012017
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140485-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sathvik, S., Kumar, G.S., Bahrami, A., Nitin, G.C., Singh, S.K., Althaqafi, E., et al. (2024) Evaluation of Asphalt Binder and Mixture Properties Utilizing Fish Scale Powder as a Biomodifier. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 20, e03238. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03238
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140485-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ji, G., Wang, X., Guo, Y., Zhang, Y., Yin, Q. and Luo, Y. (2021) Study on the Physical, Chemical and Nano-Microstructure Characteristics of Asphalt Mixed with Recycled Eggshell Waste. Sustainability, 13, Article 11173. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011173
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140485-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Koti, J. (2022) Valorization of Palm Kernel Shells in the Construction of Low-Traffic Roads. Master’s Thesis, University of Limoges. (In French) &gt;https://theses.hal.science/tel-03789638 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140485-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Varun Kumar, T.H., Mayakrishnan, M. and Somasundaram, M. (2024) Evaluation of the Properties of Bio-Asphalt Derived from Waste Cooking Oil and Low-Density Polyethylene through the Pyrolysis Process. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 21, e03604. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03604
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140485-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Thang, T.D., Cédric, S. and Hervé, D.B. (2018) Literature Review on the Damage of Bituminous Mixtures Due to Water and Freezing. National Project DVDC—Pavement Lifespan. (In French)&gt;https://dvdc.fr/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/DVDCR009-Th1-Etude-bibliographique-sur-lendommagement-des-enrobes-bitumineux-a-leau-et-au-gel-ENTPE-LC09.pdf 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140485-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lachance Tremblay, É. (2018) Sensibilité à l’eau et résistance au gel-dégel des enrobés bitumineux avec granulats de verre recycle. Doctoral dissertation, École de technologie supérieure. &gt;https://espace.etsmtl.ca/id/eprint/2167/1/LACHANCE-TREMBLAY_%C3%89ric_Th%C3%A8se.pdf 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140485-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tran, D.T. (2020) Damage to Bituminous Mixtures Subjected to Freeze-Thaw Cycles. Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Lyon. (In French) &gt;https://theses.hal.science/tel-03250064 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140485-ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mauduit, V., Mauduit, C., Greullet, N.V., Coulon, N., Hammoum, F., Hamon, D., Kerzreho, J.P., Piau, J.M. and Chabot, A. (2013) Sudden Degradation of Bituminous Mixtures during Freeze-Thaw Periods: Field Case Analysis and Exploratory Laboratory Research. Bulletin des Laboratoires des Ponts et Chaussées, 279, 47-63. (In French) &gt;https://hal.science/hal-00850949 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140485-ref28">
    <label>28</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bissada, K.K., Tan, J., Szymczyk, E., Darnell, M. and Mei, M. (2016) Group-type Characterization of Crude Oil and Bitumen. Part I: Enhanced Separation and Quantification of Saturates, Aromatics, Resins and Asphaltenes (Sara). Organic Geochemistry, 95, 21-28. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2016.02.007
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140485-ref29">
    <label>29</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Steuperaert, J. and Vanelstraete, A. (2022) Code of Best Practices for the Formulation of Bituminous Mixtures. CRR. (In French) &gt;https://brrc.be/sites/default/files/2024-01/R105.pdf 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140485-ref30">
    <label>30</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Raji, S.A. and Samuel, A.T. (2015) Egg Shell as a Fine Aggregate in Concrete for Sustainable Construction. International Journal of Scientific&amp;Technology Research, 4, 7-13. &gt;https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Samuel-Aina-3/publication/331833029_Egg_Shell_As_A_Fine_Aggregate_In_Concrete_For_Sustainable_Construction/links/5ee24b1d92851ce9e7d95c2c/Egg-Shell-As-A-Fine-Aggregate-In-Concrete-For-Sustainable-Construction.pdf 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140485-ref31">
    <label>31</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lamothe, S. (2014) Damage to a Bituminous Mixture Partially Saturated with Water or Brine Under Cyclic Freeze-Thaw and Mechanical Loading. Master’s Thesis, Université de Lyon. (In French) &gt;https://theses.hal.science/tel-01498929 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140485-ref32">
    <label>32</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Nawel, B. and Chahra, C. (2018) Valorization of Natural Fibers in Road Reinforcement: A Case Study in Ouled Fares-Chelif. (In French)&gt;http://dspace.univ-km.dz/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/2477/m%C3%A9moire%20finale.pdf?sequence=1&amp;isAllowed=y 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140485-ref33">
    <label>33</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Al-Azad, N., Asril, M.F.M. and Shah, M.K.M. (2021) A Review on Development of Natural Fibre Composites for Construction Applications. Journal of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering, 9, 1-9.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140485-ref34">
    <label>34</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Masued, G.G. (2019) Investigating the Ability of Using Eggshell Powder as a Filler in Hot Mix Asphalt Mixture. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 518, Article ID: 022047. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/518/2/022047
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140485-ref35">
    <label>35</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ansari M, M., Kumar M, D., Charles J, M. and G, V. (2016) Replacement of Cement Using Eggshell Powder. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 3, 1-2. &gt;https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/ijce-v3i3p101
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140485-ref36">
    <label>36</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Fuller, W.B. and Thompson, S.E. (1907) The Laws of Proportioning Concrete. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 59, 67-143. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1061/taceat.0001979
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140485-ref37">
    <label>37</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Furnas, C.C. (1931) Grading Aggregates—I. Mathematical Relations for Beds of Broken Solids of Maximum Density. Industrial&amp;Engineering Chemistry, 23, 1052-1058. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1021/ie50261a017
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140485-ref38">
    <label>38</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Powers, T.C. (1969) The Properties of Fresh Concrete. &gt;https://trid.trb.org/View/98906
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>